Comments on: #85 Emoticon Algebra http://invisibules.org/comic/85-emoticon-algebra what you can't see is what you get Mon, 21 May 2012 09:24:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Tanya B http://invisibules.org/comic/85-emoticon-algebra/comment-page-1#comment-335 Tanya B Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:54:50 +0000 http://invisibules.org/?p=665#comment-335 har har :p har har :p

]]> By: andrew http://invisibules.org/comic/85-emoticon-algebra/comment-page-1#comment-310 andrew Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:03:30 +0000 http://invisibules.org/?p=665#comment-310 well, now you've pointed it out I expect <em>someone</em> will mention it. Are you trying to goad me into running a regular expression search-and-replace on the whole dictionary, looking for likely candidates? well, now you’ve pointed it out I expect someone will mention it.

Are you trying to goad me into running a regular expression search-and-replace on the whole dictionary, looking for likely candidates?

]]> By: grj http://invisibules.org/comic/85-emoticon-algebra/comment-page-1#comment-309 grj Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:43:27 +0000 http://invisibules.org/?p=665#comment-309 Why has nobody mentioned Buleean logic yet? Or did I not see it? Why has nobody mentioned Buleean logic yet? Or did I not see it?

]]> By: andrew http://invisibules.org/comic/85-emoticon-algebra/comment-page-1#comment-307 andrew Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:56:51 +0000 http://invisibules.org/?p=665#comment-307 thanks! But mitotic replication would crack anyone up -- Andrew thanks! But mitotic replication would crack anyone up — Andrew

]]> By: andrew http://invisibules.org/comic/85-emoticon-algebra/comment-page-1#comment-306 andrew Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:56:10 +0000 http://invisibules.org/?p=665#comment-306 thanks for the kind thoughts. It made me think about "what goes quack-bonk quack-bonk quack-bonk?" thanks for the kind thoughts.

It made me think about “what goes quack-bonk quack-bonk quack-bonk?”

]]> By: Tanya Bilsbury http://invisibules.org/comic/85-emoticon-algebra/comment-page-1#comment-304 Tanya Bilsbury Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:49:00 +0000 http://invisibules.org/?p=665#comment-304 Hi, This is really funny, I appreciate your sense of humour. Schadenfreude, jealousy/infidelity, and mitotic replication really cracked me up. Keep it up! Cheers, Tanya Hi,

This is really funny, I appreciate your sense of humour. Schadenfreude, jealousy/infidelity, and mitotic replication really cracked me up. Keep it up!
Cheers, Tanya

]]> By: chiya http://invisibules.org/comic/85-emoticon-algebra/comment-page-1#comment-303 chiya Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:21:52 +0000 http://invisibules.org/?p=665#comment-303 hahaha.. Sorry, lameduck comments are all that are surfacing at this point. here's another one: Great site!! hahaha..

Sorry, lameduck comments are all that are surfacing at this point. here’s another one:

Great site!!

]]> By: andrew http://invisibules.org/comic/85-emoticon-algebra/comment-page-1#comment-295 andrew Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:11:21 +0000 http://invisibules.org/?p=665#comment-295 In fact addition isn't even deterministic in emoticon algebra! Yes, emotions are more complicated than we ever realised, aren't they? And now we have the maths to prove it. In fact addition isn’t even deterministic in emoticon algebra!

Yes, emotions are more complicated than we ever realised, aren’t they? And now we have the maths to prove it.

]]> By: mpj http://invisibules.org/comic/85-emoticon-algebra/comment-page-1#comment-294 mpj Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:45:18 +0000 http://invisibules.org/?p=665#comment-294 I see addition is not associative in Emoticon Algebra. I see addition is not associative in Emoticon Algebra.

]]>